A Brescia si consumano più di 1396 metri quadri di territorio per ogni nuovo abitante. Un record, almeno se si fa il raffronto con Milano e con Stoccarda, città tedesca che per popolazione è intermedia tra le due lombarde.
Un raffronto che è stato fatto nella European Iale Conference dello scorso anno tenuta a Salisburgo, in cui la Leonessa ha fatto da campione.
Batte Milano, che è una grande città industriale, non una Todi a misura d’uomo. E la ricerca dice che non è paragonabile a Stoccarda, dove, come in tutta la Germania, c’è una particolare attenzione, un riguardo, quasi, a tenere un rapporto costante tra il costruito e le aree verdi. Se cresce l’uno debbono crescere proporzionalmente anche le altre.
Sono dati che si riferiscono ai primi sette anni del Duemila e che riguardano proprio il capoluogo. Ma lo studio prende in considerazione anche gli anelli dei comuni limitrofi, la cintura dell’hinterland ma anche oltre, fino a Montichiari. Anche in queste fasce si verifica un consumo di territorio, ma to a lesser extent. In the capital - as seen from the graph - have lost 330 hectares of agricultural land for 2638.
Paolo Pileri (Po Polytechnic) writes Professor Paolo Pileri the Department of Architecture at the Politecnico di Milano, which, limited to the years 1999-2004, the growth rate of the population of Milan was in those years, negative and equal to -0.6 percent, compared with a rate of growth of urbanization of 2.4 percent. Instead, in Brescia, the population was increased slightly by 0.7 percent, but urbanization had risen by 4.6 percent.
numbers, they, which, though slightly older than the data presented in Salzburg, confirm the rapid pace of building in our town, a pace that slows only slightly in the neighborhood. A pace that makes you say to the teacher in Milan that "the transformation of agricultural and natural in urban areas has been intense. And there is no consistency between urban growth and demand growth. " That is, there is insufficient demand to justify the cement.
If this is the trend, it should be noted that the static picture of the territory of Brescia complaint instead of a rate of 50 per cent of urbabizzazione less than this in Milan, where more than 75 percent. "When you are at the level of Milan you can say that there is no more territory to "eat" and that the ability of a municipality autosostenibiltà is gone. But already 50 percent indicates that it must implement policies of containment. I think the German model and the ecological compensation that is rigorously applied in that country, so every square foot of new construction is balanced with equal area to renaturalization. And when the rate exceeds 35 per cent of the ecological compensation should be increased. "
halls and houses in Lower Brescia BRESCIA development would be characterized - according to the analysis - from the proliferation of one and two-family houses and small apartment buildings, a trend that would also explain the report "negative" territory between consumption and population growth. And who is responsible for the phenomenon known as urban sprawl Pileri calls "the most undesirable effect."
In the absence of containment policies - known then - do little even the protection schemes and protection of the landscape, in which prevail. It gives the example of the area south of Milan, set at the agricultural park, but was subject to an annual loss of land for the building but not less than areas without protection.
What strategies and policies should be implemented? "The ecological compensation, as mentioned, is an important tool, then used an inventory of abandoned buildings and those sottoutilizzati. In Italia il patrimonio edilizio inutilizzato è del 20 per cento, in Germania solo del 5».
;)
;)
Paolo Pileri (Po Polytechnic) ;)
halls and houses in Lower 
