Quali sono i limiti del potere discrezionale della pubblica amministrazione in materia di bonifica di siti contaminati di interesse nazionale ? Up where you can push the administrative discretion of the court?
Who has the jurisdiction in remediation?
And how should the government act against a request for remodeling remediation targets ?
From this last question, the TAR Florence pointed out that if a person wishes to exercise the power in art. 265 Legislative Decree no. 152/06 - remodeling remediation targets, based on different methodology, based on the progressive exceedance of contamination and risk, giving rise to the reclamation procedure - the Administration is not required to have variations, if not in its discretion considers otherwise conform to the objectives, but must still consider the request by the concerned private and possibly justify the reasons for refusal and in no case have not heard about any.
In any case, there is certainly, on technical and environmental a certain degree of discretion by the court before which the pa decisions of the administrative judge stops.
But forget che tale sindacato può comunque sempre esercitarsi nelle ipotesi di contraddittorietà ed illogicità manifesta, dovendo comunque sempre le decisioni della p.a. sostanziarsi come adeguatamente motivate, corrette, ragionevoli, proporzionate e attendibili, anche qualora si dia luogo all’applicazione della c.d. “discrezionalità tecnica”.
But forget che tale sindacato può comunque sempre esercitarsi nelle ipotesi di contraddittorietà ed illogicità manifesta, dovendo comunque sempre le decisioni della p.a. sostanziarsi come adeguatamente motivate, corrette, ragionevoli, proporzionate e attendibili, anche qualora si dia luogo all’applicazione della c.d. “discrezionalità tecnica”.
Nel caso analizzato nella sentenza che vi propongo oggi ( TAR Firenze, n. 6610/10 , che potete scaricare gratuitamente sul sito di Natura Giuridica, previa semplice registrazione ), si dibatteva intorno all’annosa questione relativa alla barriera physical and hydraulic barrier, already addressed in the pages of the blog (or hydraulic physical barrier: this is the problem ).
Well, the Board noted that the in-depth explanation of the reasons for the improved effectiveness of physical confinement in the memory of the Administration at that time were to be included in the justification of the requirements of: no may be an integrated form of the motivation for the first time represented in court and without hearing.
Finally: in the environmental field, based on the so-called "precautionary principle " from the Community, government may take measures deemed necessary where it mentioned the risk of injury to a protected interest, even in the absence of a risk actually found.
Again, however, there is a "but": but it is also necessary that this principle is combined with that of "proportionality ", consisting of the duty to adopt solutions of the same pa appropriate involving the least possible sacrifice for the parties concerned without being able to impose, through administrative or legal instruments, obligations or restrictions on freedom (including economic) of citizens, such as protected under Community law, in excess, so disproportionate to what is necessary to the public interest in the presence and availability of other equally effective but less negative incidents
There is, in essence, a prevalence of one principle over another, but must seek a balance in relation to their balanced public and private interests into account.
So, once again it is emphasized that the Administration can not afford to act when and how discretion wants, but must always involve stakeholders, and must give reasons for their choices.
With less discretion and a little 'more discretion ....
***
If you liked this article, subscribe to RSS or enter your email that you find in the box below and confirm your subscription by responding to the email you receive on your e-mail: receive all updates free of legal direct to your inbox
Photo: "discretion" originally uploaded by DISAMISTADE_my life is a reportage!
0 comments:
Post a Comment